Nunnally v. State

156 S.E. 461, 42 Ga. App. 410, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 428
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 19, 1930·No. 20934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the facts of the case as disclosed by the record, the evidence set forth in the fourth ground of the motion for a new trial was admissible, and the court erred in excluding it. The remaining special grounds are without merit.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. J. W. Overstreet, J. 8. Powell, for plaintiff in error. W. G. Neville, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nunnally v. State, 156 S.E. 461, 42 Ga. App. 410, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 428 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

156 S.E. 461 (Nunnally v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grieco v. State
626 So. 2d 968 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)