Nunnally v. State

156 S.E. 461, 42 Ga. App. 410, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 428
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 19, 1930
Docket20934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 S.E. 461 (Nunnally v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nunnally v. State, 156 S.E. 461, 42 Ga. App. 410, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 428 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the facts of the case as disclosed by the record, the evidence set forth in the fourth ground of the motion for a new trial was admissible, and the court erred in excluding it. The remaining special grounds are without merit.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. J. W. Overstreet, J. 8. Powell, for plaintiff in error. W. G. Neville, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grieco v. State
626 So. 2d 968 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 S.E. 461, 42 Ga. App. 410, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nunnally-v-state-gactapp-1930.