Nunnally v. City of Huntsville

Alabama Court of Appeals

Nunnally v. City of Huntsville

111 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 684

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 1, 1927·No. 8 Div. 517.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.,

The prosecution of this appellant was for the violation of an ordinance of the city of Huntsville; the specific charge being the violation of the prohibition laws of said city. Prom a conviction in the mayor’s cour.t, he appealed to the circuit court, and was there tried by the court, without a jury, upon an amended complaint filed by the city, was again convicted, and, from the judgment of conviction in the circuit court, this appeal was taken. The appeal is here submitted upon motion to affirm. This motion must prevail, as there are' no assignments of error or brief by appellant, as the law requires in appeals of this character. Motion to affirm is granted. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.,

The prosecution of this appellant was for the violation of an ordinance of the city of Huntsville; the specific charge being the violation of the prohibition laws of said city. Prom a conviction in the mayor’s cour.t, he appealed to the circuit court, and was there tried by the court, without a jury, upon an amended complaint filed by the city, was again convicted, and, from the judgment of conviction in the circuit court, this appeal was taken. The appeal is here submitted upon motion to affirm. This motion must prevail, as there are' no assignments of error or brief by appellant, as the law requires in appeals of this character. Motion to affirm is granted. Affirmed.

Nunnally v. City of Huntsville, 111 So. 926, 22 Ala. App. 684 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

111 So. 926 (Nunnally v. City of Huntsville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.