Nunn v. State

106 S.W.2d 702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nunn v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Tex. Crim. 266
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 16, 1937·No. No. 19085·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for being a delinquent child; punishment, confinement for one year in the reformatory.

This prosecution seems to have proceeded only upon a complaint. We find in the record no information. This we regard as a fatal defect. See art. 1085, C.C. P.; Ex parte Cain, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 509, 217 S.W. 386; Hogue v. State, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 170, 220 S.W. 96; Brown v. State, 99 Tex. Cr.R. 70, 268 S.W. 460; Ex parte Chandler, 99 Tex.Cr.R. 255, 268 S.W. 749. Because the statute requires an information, and none appears in the record, this court is without jurisdiction. Inasmuch as there appears a complaint in accordance with the demands of the statute, and an information may be filed, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nunn v. State, 106 S.W.2d 702 (Tex. 1937).

106 S.W.2d 702 (Nunn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hogue v. State
220 S.W. 96 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Ex Parte Eugenia Chandler
268 S.W. 1117 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Ex Parte Cain
217 S.W. 386 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Brown v. State
268 S.W. 460 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Ex parte Chandler
268 S.W. 749 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)