Nunley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nunley v. State

429 S.W.3d 484, 2014 WL 1705110, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 469

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 29, 2014·No. No. ED 100219·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Nunley appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Nunley appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Nunley v. State, 429 S.W.3d 484, 2014 WL 1705110, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 469 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

429 S.W.3d 484 (Nunley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.