Nunley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nunley v. State

689 So. 2d 1299, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2797, 1997 WL 134311

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 1997

DocketNo. 96-1208

StatusPublished

This text of 689 So. 2d 1299 (Nunley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nunley v. State, 689 So. 2d 1299, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2797, 1997 WL 134311 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes and we hold that the trial court erred in modifying appellant’s restitution four years after entry of the original order of restitution. The trial court did not reserve jurisdiction to modify the amount of restitution after assessing the costs of coun[1300]*1300seling for the victim. Accordingly, we quash the amended order of restitution.

GUNTHER, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes and we hold that the trial court erred in modifying appellant’s restitution four years after entry of the original order of restitution. The trial court did not reserve jurisdiction to modify the amount of restitution after assessing the costs of coun[1300]*1300seling for the victim. Accordingly, we quash the amended order of restitution.

GUNTHER, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

689 So. 2d 1299, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2797, 1997 WL 134311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nunley-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.