Nungesser v. Nungesser

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Nungesser v. Nungesser

818 So. 2d 778, 2002 La. LEXIS 1975, 2002 WL 1313167

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 7, 2002

DocketNo. 2002-CC-1027

StatusPublished

This text of 818 So. 2d 778 (Nungesser v. Nungesser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nungesser v. Nungesser, 818 So. 2d 778, 2002 La. LEXIS 1975, 2002 WL 1313167 (La. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Nungesser, William A. et al.; Nungesser, William H. Jr.; Nungesser, Eric; Nungesser, Hugh; General Marine Leasing Inc.;' — Defendants; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. B, No. 99-5506; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-C-0161.

Granted. In light of the complexity of this discovery ruling, it appears a written judgment was contemplated by the trial court and the parties. Therefore, the ruling at issue for purposes of Rule 4-3 was the written judgment of December 17, 2001. Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), 680 So.2d 1167. Relator’s notice of intent was filed within thirty days of that date, and its writ application was filed within the deadline set by the trial court. Accordingly, the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Nungesser, William A. et al.; Nungesser, William H. Jr.; Nungesser, Eric; Nungesser, Hugh; General Marine Leasing Inc.;' — Defendants; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. B, No. 99-5506; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-C-0161.

Granted. In light of the complexity of this discovery ruling, it appears a written judgment was contemplated by the trial court and the parties. Therefore, the ruling at issue for purposes of Rule 4-3 was the written judgment of December 17, 2001. Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), 680 So.2d 1167. Relator’s notice of intent was filed within thirty days of that date, and its writ application was filed within the deadline set by the trial court. Accordingly, the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

818 So. 2d 778, 2002 La. LEXIS 1975, 2002 WL 1313167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nungesser-v-nungesser-la-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack