Nunge v. Cegretto

3 Teiss. 39, 1905 La. App. LEXIS 112
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 22, 1905
DocketNo. 3770
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Teiss. 39 (Nunge v. Cegretto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nunge v. Cegretto, 3 Teiss. 39, 1905 La. App. LEXIS 112 (La. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinions

DUFOUR, J

The matters alleged as cause for dismissal are of such'a nature as to require a thorough examination of the record in order to determine their correctness.

Under such circumstances, our practice is to refer the motion to the merits. .. -

The motion is dismissed in limine without prejudice.

ON THE MOTION TO DISMISS.

1. In a suit to annul a donation inter vivos the jurisdiction of the appellate court will he determined, in the absence of any other evidence of the present value of the’ property, by the value of the property as fixed by the Act of donation.

2. The value of the property as thus fixed being within our jurisdictional limit the motion to dismiss or transfer is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Teiss. 39, 1905 La. App. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nunge-v-cegretto-lactapp-1905.