Nunez v. Zhagui
This text of 60 A.D.3d 559 (Nunez v. Zhagui) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[560]*560Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.), entered August 8, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
After defendant’s showing of prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, the court properly found that plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact through his treating doctor’s affirmation, which, when considered in connection with MRIs taken within weeks of the accident, found objective medical findings of range of motion limitations contemporaneous with the accident and upon recent examination (see Thompson v Abbasi, 15 AD3d 95, 97 [2005]). The existence of a serious injury is also supported by the affirmed report of the orthopedic surgeon who performed surgery on plaintiffs left knee 21/2 years after the accident, and found, among other things, a crack on the lateral facet of the patella (see Morris v Cisse, 58 AD3d 455 [2009]).
We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.3d 559, 876 N.Y.S.2d 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nunez-v-zhagui-nyappdiv-2009.