Nunez v. Wah Kok Realty Corp.

110 A.D.3d 560, 973 N.Y.S.2d 558
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 24, 2013·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered April 18, 2013, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied. Triable issues of fact exist as to whether the large, spreading Christmas tree on which plaintiff tripped was an open and obvious and not inherently dangerous condition (see Centeno v Regine’s Originals, 5 AD3d 210, 211 [1st Dept 2004]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2013 NY Slip Op 30782OJ).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nunez v. Wah Kok Realty Corp., 110 A.D.3d 560, 973 N.Y.S.2d 558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

110 A.D.3d 560 (Nunez v. Wah Kok Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hutson v. Regis High Sch.
2024 NY Slip Op 01987 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Stolzman v. City of New York
2017 NY Slip Op 247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)