Nunez v. State
This text of 28 So. 3d 952 (Nunez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence. The prosecutor’s isolated statement concerning the law, which was arguably a misstatement, followed by the trial court’s proper instructions to the jury with respect to the law does not constitute grounds for reversal. See Lugo v. State, 845 So.2d 74, 108-109 (Fla.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 920, 124 S.Ct. 320, 157 L.Ed.2d 216 (2003); Cabrera v. State, 490 So.2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see also Fennie v. State, 855 So.2d 597, 609 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 975, 124 S.Ct. 1877, 158 L.Ed.2d 471 (2004).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 So. 3d 952, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1943, 2010 WL 565275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nunez-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.