Nunez v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
MISTY NUNEZ OBO A.F.G., Plaintiff,
vs. Case No.: 1:24-cv-00838-KG-JHR FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, the Court finds the Motion (ECF No. 21) and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff is awarded $7,300.00 in fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 et seq. This award is payable to Plaintiff1 but should be mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) (EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney). Defendant’s payment of this amount is without prejudice to the right of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek attorney fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA.
1 The Commissioner recognizes that Plaintiff has assigned her right to EAJA fees and expenses to his attorney. If, after receiving the Court’s EAJA order, the Commissioner determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, then the Commissioner will agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the EAJA award will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA award after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney. 2. Plaintiff is awarded costs in the amount of $405.00, to be paid by the Judgment Fund, not by agency funds, see 28 U.S.C. § 2412(c)(1). 3. In light of the parties’ Stipulated Motion (ECF No. 21), Plaintiff’s previously filed motion for EAJA fees (ECF No. 20) is denied as moot. /s/__________________________________ KENNETH J. GONZALES2 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY:
Electronically submitted 9/3/2025 JESSICA MILANO Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant
Electronically approved 8/26/2025 Eddy Pierre Pierre Attorney for Plaintiff
2 Please note that this document has been electronically filed. To verify its authenticity, please refer to the Digital File Stamp on the NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) accompanying this document. Electronically filed documents can be found on the court’s PACER public access system.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nunez v. Social Security Administration (Nunez v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.