NUNEZ STATIONERY PRINTING & THERMOGRAPHY, INC. v. MAKA INVESTMENTS, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 2021·No. 21-0963·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed December 15, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D21-0963

Lower Tribunal No. 18-26458

Nunez Stationery Printing & Thermography, Inc., Appellant,

vs.

Maka Investments, LLC,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alan Fine, Judge.

MetschLaw, P.A., and Lawrence R. Metsch, for appellant.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Alexandra Valdes, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Rosamond v. Mann, 80 So. 2d 317, 319 (Fla. 1955) (“[T]he general rule is that the tenancy arising from the tenant’s holding over with the consent of the landlord is presumed to be upon the same covenants and terms as the original lease . . . .”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUNEZ STATIONERY PRINTING & THERMOGRAPHY, INC. v. MAKA INVESTMENTS, LLC, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

NUNEZ STATIONERY PRINTING & THERMOGRAPHY, INC. v. MAKA INVESTMENTS, LLC (NUNEZ STATIONERY PRINTING & THERMOGRAPHY, INC. v. MAKA INVESTMENTS, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosamond v. Mann
80 So. 2d 317 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)