NUNEZ STATIONERY PRINTING & THERMOGRAPHY, INC. v. MAKA INVESTMENTS, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida

NUNEZ STATIONERY PRINTING & THERMOGRAPHY, INC. v. MAKA INVESTMENTS, LLC

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 15, 2021

Docket21-0963

StatusPublished

This text of NUNEZ STATIONERY PRINTING & THERMOGRAPHY, INC. v. MAKA INVESTMENTS, LLC (NUNEZ STATIONERY PRINTING & THERMOGRAPHY, INC. v. MAKA INVESTMENTS, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NUNEZ STATIONERY PRINTING & THERMOGRAPHY, INC. v. MAKA INVESTMENTS, LLC, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed December 15, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0963 Lower Tribunal No. 18-26458 ________________

Nunez Stationery Printing & Thermography, Inc., Appellant,

vs.

Maka Investments, LLC, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alan Fine, Judge.

MetschLaw, P.A., and Lawrence R. Metsch, for appellant.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Alexandra Valdes, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Rosamond v. Mann, 80 So. 2d 317, 319 (Fla. 1955) (“[T]he

general rule is that the tenancy arising from the tenant’s holding over with

the consent of the landlord is presumed to be upon the same covenants and

terms as the original lease . . . .”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI