Nunez-Reyes v. Holder

646 F.3d 684
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nunez-Reyes v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 646 F.3d 684
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 24, 2010·No. 05-74350·Published

Opinion

631 F.3d 1295 (2010)

Flavio NUNEZ-REYES, aka Flavio Reyes, Petitioner,
v.
Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-74350.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 24, 2010.

Frank P. Sprouls, Esquire, Law Office of Ricci and Sprouls, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Holly Smith, Esquire, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Agency No. A078-181-648.

Prior report: 602 F.3d 1102.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nunez-Reyes v. Holder, 646 F.3d 684 (9th Cir. 2010).

646 F.3d 684 (Nunez-Reyes v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nunez-Reyes v. Holder
602 F.3d 1102 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)