Nunez, David
This text of Nunez, David (Nunez, David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-89,875-01
EX PARTE DAVID NUNEZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1470221-A IN THE 182ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of
theft of property valued at $20,000 or more but less than $100,000, and sentenced to imprisonment
for seven years.
On October 24, 2017, an order designating issues was signed by the trial court. The habeas
record has been properly forwarded to this Court by the district clerk pursuant to TEX . R. APP . P.
73.4(b)(5). However, the record has been forwarded without the trial court having resolved the
designated issue(s) in this case. We remand this application to the 182nd District Court of Harris County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
It appears that Applicant’s sentence may have discharged. Accordingly, the habeas court
shall determine whether Applicant is still confined on this conviction. See Ex parte Harrington, 310
S.W.3d 452, 454 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). If Applicant is no longer confined on this conviction, then
the habeas court shall enter findings of fact and conclusions of law to that effect. If Applicant is still
confined on this conviction, then the habeas court shall either: (1) obtain an affidavit from trial
counsel and enter findings and conclusions addressing the merits of Applicant’s allegations; (2)
determine that the current record is sufficient to resolve the allegations and enter findings and
conclusions without an affidavit from trial counsel; or (3) enter a recommended disposition of this
application without entering findings of fact and conclusions of law.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, if any, and
recommendation, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any
extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: June 5, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nunez, David, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nunez-david-texcrimapp-2019.