Nugent v. Nugent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nugent v. Nugent

236 A.D. 806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 806 (Nugent v. Nugent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nugent v. Nugent, 236 A.D. 806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order (except as to first item) reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, on the following questions in addition to the one allowed in the order appealed from: 2. Did the defendant have information or knowledge prior to July 11, 1929, that the horse owned by him had vicious propensities? 3. Was the plaintiff on the premises of defendant on the invitation of the latter at the time the alleged injury occurred? We are of opinion that plaintiff is entitled to the examination to the extent indicated herein; the examination to be had at a time and place to be fixed by the Special Term, or by stipulation of the parties. Lazansky, P. J.,- Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order (except as to first item) reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, on the following questions in addition to the one allowed in the order appealed from: 2. Did the defendant have information or knowledge prior to July 11, 1929, that the horse owned by him had vicious propensities? 3. Was the plaintiff on the premises of defendant on the invitation of the latter at the time the alleged injury occurred? We are of opinion that plaintiff is entitled to the examination to the extent indicated herein; the examination to be had at a time and place to be fixed by the Special Term, or by stipulation of the parties. Lazansky, P. J.,- Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nugent-v-nugent-nyappdiv-1932.