Nugent v. Mazange

Superior Court of Louisiana

Nugent v. Mazange

2 Mart. 265

DecidedJuly 1, 1812

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Mart. 265 (Nugent v. Mazange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nugent v. Mazange, 2 Mart. 265 (La. Super. Ct. 1812).

Pincite

Opinion

By the C~ourt.

The defendant having passed the note to the plaintiff, after the alteration in the place of payment was made, cannot take advantage of this alteration. It may affect the tiote as to thc maker, and the enclorsers through whose hands it passed before it was altered; but endorsers, who received and passed it away after, cannot complain.

WHEn there was a regular notice, in other words, whether the one given was left at the pro per place, was a matter of evidence, properly to be determined by the jury.

New trial denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the C~ourt.

The defendant having passed the note to the plaintiff, after the alteration in the place of payment was made, cannot take advantage of this alteration. It may affect the tiote as to thc maker, and the enclorsers through whose hands it passed before it was altered; but endorsers, who received and passed it away after, cannot complain.

WHEn there was a regular notice, in other words, whether the one given was left at the pro per place, was a matter of evidence, properly to be determined by the jury.

New trial denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Mart. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nugent-v-mazange-lasuperct-1812.