Nugent v. Locke

California Supreme Court

Nugent v. Locke

4 Cal. 318

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1854

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 4 Cal. 318 (Nugent v. Locke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318 (Cal. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Oh. J. Murray concurred.

The contract set out in the declaration, discloses the formation of a partnership between the parties. The only remedy of the plaintiff is by bill in equity to dissolve the partnership, and obtain an account.

The suit here is to recover damages for breach of contract, which, under the circumstances, is impracticable.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Oh. J. Murray concurred.

The contract set out in the declaration, discloses the formation of a partnership between the parties. The only remedy of the plaintiff is by bill in equity to dissolve the partnership, and obtain an account.

The suit here is to recover damages for breach of contract, which, under the circumstances, is impracticable.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cal. 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nugent-v-locke-cal-1854.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack