Nugent v. Lindsley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Nugent v. Lindsley

156 A. 917, 109 N.J. Eq. 134, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 557

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 19, 1931·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 87, under the title of James R. Nugent v. Stuart Lindsley.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Camrbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, ECeteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 87, under the title of James R. Nugent v. Stuart Lindsley.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Camrbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, ECeteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Nugent v. Lindsley, 156 A. 917, 109 N.J. Eq. 134, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 557 (N.J. 1931).

Pincite

156 A. 917 (Nugent v. Lindsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.