Nugent v. Lindsley

156 A. 917, 109 N.J. Eq. 134, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 557
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 19, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 156 A. 917 (Nugent v. Lindsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nugent v. Lindsley, 156 A. 917, 109 N.J. Eq. 134, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 557 (N.J. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 87, under the title of James R. Nugent v. Stuart Lindsley.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Camrbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, ECeteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 A. 917, 109 N.J. Eq. 134, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nugent-v-lindsley-nj-1931.