Nugent v. Lindsay

135 A. 919, 103 N.J.L. 500, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 219
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1927·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered bj the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nugent v. Lindsay, 135 A. 919, 103 N.J.L. 500, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 219 (N.J. 1927).

135 A. 919 (Nugent v. Lindsay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.