Nugent v. City of Alexandria

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Nugent v. City of Alexandria

602 So. 2d 734, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 1550

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 20, 1992

DocketNos. 90-345 to 90-347

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 602 So. 2d 734 (Nugent v. City of Alexandria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nugent v. City of Alexandria, 602 So. 2d 734, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 1550 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

JOSEPH E. COREIL, Judge Pro Tem.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Randy Matthews v. City of Alexandria, 602 So.2d 731 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992), (docket # 90-345 of this Court), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. Costs of appeal and at the trial level are assessed to Randy Matthews and James Nugent. Costs of these remand proceedings are assessed to City of Alexandria.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOSEPH E. COREIL, Judge Pro Tem.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Randy Matthews v. City of Alexandria, 602 So.2d 731 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992), (docket # 90-345 of this Court), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. Costs of appeal and at the trial level are assessed to Randy Matthews and James Nugent. Costs of these remand proceedings are assessed to City of Alexandria.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND RENDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

602 So. 2d 734, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 1550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nugent-v-city-of-alexandria-lactapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack