Nugent v. Atlas Steam-Ship Co.

16 N.Y.S. 66, 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 927, 61 Hun 626, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 310
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 16, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was before the court upon a previous occasion, a judgment having been rendered for the plaintiff. Upon that appeal, the judgment was reversed and a new trial ordered. Upon the new trial the same evidence was introduced before the jury as had been introduced upon the first trial, and, in pursuance of the decision upon the previous appeal, the judge presiding dismissed the complaint, and from the judgment thereupon entered this appeal is taken. Upon an examination of the record now presented, we see no reason to change the views expressed upon the previous appeal, which seem, moreover, to be sustained by the case of Butler v. Townsend, 126 N. Y. 105, 26 N. E. Rep. 1017. For the reasons stated in the opinion upon the previous appeal, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nugent v. Atlas Steam-Ship Co., 16 N.Y.S. 66, 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 927, 61 Hun 626, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 310 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

16 N.Y.S. 66 (Nugent v. Atlas Steam-Ship Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Libbey
19 N.Y.S. 680 (New York City Court, 1892)