Nugent v. Atlas Steam-Ship Co.

New York Supreme Court

Nugent v. Atlas Steam-Ship Co.

16 N.Y.S. 66, 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 927, 61 Hun 626, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 310

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 16, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 N.Y.S. 66 (Nugent v. Atlas Steam-Ship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nugent v. Atlas Steam-Ship Co., 16 N.Y.S. 66, 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 927, 61 Hun 626, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 310 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was before the court upon a previous occasion, a judgment having been rendered for the plaintiff. Upon that appeal, the judgment was reversed and a new trial ordered. Upon the new trial the same evidence was introduced before the jury as had been introduced upon the first trial, and, in pursuance of the decision upon the previous appeal, the judge presiding dismissed the complaint, and from the judgment thereupon entered this appeal is taken. Upon an examination of the record now presented, we see no reason to change the views expressed upon the previous appeal, which seem, moreover, to be sustained by the case of Butler v. Townsend, 126 N. Y. 105, 26 N. E. Rep. 1017. For the reasons stated in the opinion upon the previous appeal, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action was before the court upon a previous occasion, a judgment having been rendered for the plaintiff. Upon that appeal, the judgment was reversed and a new trial ordered. Upon the new trial the same evidence was introduced before the jury as had been introduced upon the first trial, and, in pursuance of the decision upon the previous appeal, the judge presiding dismissed the complaint, and from the judgment thereupon entered this appeal is taken. Upon an examination of the record now presented, we see no reason to change the views expressed upon the previous appeal, which seem, moreover, to be sustained by the case of Butler v. Townsend, 126 N. Y. 105, 26 N. E. Rep. 1017. For the reasons stated in the opinion upon the previous appeal, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 N.Y.S. 66, 40 N.Y. St. Rep. 927, 61 Hun 626, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nugent-v-atlas-steam-ship-co-nysupct-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack