Nugent v. 1235 Concourse Tenants Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nugent v. 1235 Concourse Tenants Corp.

83 A.D.3d 532, 920 N.Y.S.2d 660

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 2011·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered May 19, 2010, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants failed to establish prima facie that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition (see Giuffrida v Metro N. Commuter R.R. Co., 279 AD2d 403, 404 [2001]). While the superintendent asserted that he inspected the premises periodically, he failed to provide a time for the last inspection preceding plaintiff’s fall (see Porco v Marshalls Dept. Stores, 30 AD3d 284 [2006]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered May 19, 2010, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants failed to establish prima facie that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition (see Giuffrida v Metro N. Commuter R.R. Co., 279 AD2d 403, 404 [2001]). While the superintendent asserted that he inspected the premises periodically, he failed to provide a time for the last inspection preceding plaintiff’s fall (see Porco v Marshalls Dept. Stores, 30 AD3d 284 [2006]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Nugent v. 1235 Concourse Tenants Corp., 83 A.D.3d 532, 920 N.Y.S.2d 660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

83 A.D.3d 532 (Nugent v. 1235 Concourse Tenants Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related