Nucor Steel. v. Dir.

2016 Ark. App. 377

Opinion

Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 377

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. E-16-154

NUCOR STEEL Opinion Delivered September 7, 2016 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS V. BOARD OF REVIEW [NO. 2016-BR-00139]

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, AND APPEAL DISMISSED KEITH LEDBETTER APPELLEES

RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge

Appellant Nucor Steel (“Nucor”), a corporation, appeals from the Arkansas Board of

Review’s March 10, 2016 decision, reversing the Appeal Tribunal and finding that the

claimant, Keith Ledbetter, was entitled to benefits because he was discharged from last work

for reasons other than misconduct. We dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction.

On April 24, 2016, Nucor filed its petition for appeal with this court. The petition was

signed by Kellie Crain, who is not a licensed attorney. It is well settled that corporations must

be represented by licensed attorneys. Smithco Invs. of W. Memphis, Inc. v. Morgan Keegan &

Co., 370 Ark. 477, 261 S.W.3d 454 (2007). Furthermore, our supreme court has held that

when a party not licensed to practice law in this state attempts to represent the interests of

others by submitting himself or herself to the jurisdiction of a court, those actions, such as the

filing of pleadings, are rendered a nullity. Id. Here, Crain is not an attorney and may not

represent Nucor in this case. Id. Our case law makes it clear that invoking the process of a Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 377

court of law constitutes the practice of law. Stephens Prod. Co. v. Bennett, 2015 Ark. App. 617.

Because Crain was practicing law when she signed the petition, the petition is null and void.

Id. As a result, we lack jurisdiction and dismiss this appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

VIRDEN and GRUBER, JJ., agree.

No briefs filed.