Nuckols v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Nuckols v. Mitchell

4 Greene 432

DecidedJuly 1, 1854

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Greene 432 (Nuckols v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nuckols v. Mitchell, 4 Greene 432 (iowa 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion hy

Greene, .1.

Action on a promissory note, commenced by S. Nickols. Attachment proceedings commenced simultaneously with the suit. On motion, the writ of attachment was dismissed, on the,ground that the clerk had no authority to issue the writ until after the suit was commenced.

It appears that the original notice and the writ of attachment were issued and returned ar, the same time. As the notice and writ hear the sain.* date, we take it for grmted that the action and the attachment commenced their progress together. Under the Code, | IS-ffl, property may be attached at the coni-mmc .blent or during the progress of the [433]*433proceedings. The writ in this case was issued at the commencement of the action, and therefore comes within the requirements of the Code. ■ The court erred in sustaining the motion on the grounds stated.

C. M Stone, for appellant. Starr and Clarke, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion hy

Greene, .1.

Action on a promissory note, commenced by S. Nickols. Attachment proceedings commenced simultaneously with the suit. On motion, the writ of attachment was dismissed, on the,ground that the clerk had no authority to issue the writ until after the suit was commenced.

It appears that the original notice and the writ of attachment were issued and returned ar, the same time. As the notice and writ hear the sain.* date, we take it for grmted that the action and the attachment commenced their progress together. Under the Code, | IS-ffl, property may be attached at the coni-mmc .blent or during the progress of the [433]*433proceedings. The writ in this case was issued at the commencement of the action, and therefore comes within the requirements of the Code. ■ The court erred in sustaining the motion on the grounds stated.

C. M Stone, for appellant. Starr and Clarke, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Greene 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nuckols-v-mitchell-iowa-1854.