Nuckles v. Security National Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Nuckles v. Security National Bank

93 S.E.2d 447, 244 N.C. 398, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 409

DecidedJune 26, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E.2d 447 (Nuckles v. Security National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nuckles v. Security National Bank, 93 S.E.2d 447, 244 N.C. 398, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 409 (N.C. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The three assignments of error contained in the record are feckless. The infant defendants are beneficiaries under the trust and are necessary parties to the final determination of the action. The judgment entered is fully sustained by the facts agreed and found by •the court, and no error appears on the face of the record. Therefore, the judgment entered in the court below must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The three assignments of error contained in the record are feckless. The infant defendants are beneficiaries under the trust and are necessary parties to the final determination of the action. The judgment entered is fully sustained by the facts agreed and found by •the court, and no error appears on the face of the record. Therefore, the judgment entered in the court below must be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 S.E.2d 447, 244 N.C. 398, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nuckles-v-security-national-bank-nc-1956.