Nuby v. Integra Property Group, LLC

District Court, D. Kansas·Decided July 23, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-02317·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Anna Nuby et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 25-2317-JWL

Integra Property Group, LLC et al.,

Defendants. MEMORANDUM & ORDER Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against defendants alleging, among other claims, discrimination pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. This matter is presently before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for “interlocutory order of default” (doc. 7). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 envisions a two-step process for obtaining a default judgment. Meyers v. Pfizer, Inc., 581 Fed. Appx. 708, 710 (10th Cir. 2014). First, the party wishing to obtain a default judgment must apprise the court that the opposing party has failed to plead or otherwise defend by requesting “by affidavit or otherwise” that the clerk enter default on the docket. Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Second, following an entry of default by the clerk, the party entitled to a judgment by default shall apply to the clerk or the court under Rule 55(b), depending on the nature of the relief requested. Meyers, 581 Fed. Appx. at 708 & n.3. Plaintiffs have not yet obtained a clerk’s entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a). The motion, then, is denied without prejudice to refiling a motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b) upon the clerk’s entry of default. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT plaintiffs’ motion interlocutory order of default (doc. 7) is denied without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 23rd day of July, 2025, at Kansas City, Kansas.

s/John W. Lungstrum HON. JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nuby v. Integra Property Group, LLC, (D. Kan. 2025).

Nuby v. Integra Property Group, LLC (Nuby v. Integra Property Group, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyers v. Pfizer, Inc.
581 F. App'x 708 (Tenth Circuit, 2014)