Nuamah v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nuamah v. City of New York

13 A.D.3d 502, 786 N.Y.S.2d 312, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15855

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated May 28, 2004, which denied his motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The denial of the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim was a provident exercise of discretion (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Matter of Hicks v City of New York, 8 AD3d 566 [2004]; Matter of Camilleri v County of Suffolk, 190 AD2d 669 [1993]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Smith and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated May 28, 2004, which denied his motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The denial of the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim was a provident exercise of discretion (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Matter of Hicks v City of New York, 8 AD3d 566 [2004]; Matter of Camilleri v County of Suffolk, 190 AD2d 669 [1993]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Smith and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Nuamah v. City of New York, 13 A.D.3d 502, 786 N.Y.S.2d 312, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

13 A.D.3d 502 (Nuamah v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related