Nuamah v. City of New York
This text of 13 A.D.3d 502 (Nuamah v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated May 28, 2004, which denied his motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The denial of the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim was a provident exercise of discretion (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Matter of Hicks v City of New York, 8 AD3d 566 [2004]; Matter of Camilleri v County of Suffolk, 190 AD2d 669 [1993]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Smith and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 A.D.3d 502, 786 N.Y.S.2d 312, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nuamah-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2004.