Nu-Art Series v. Creative Company

188 S.W.3d 34, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 136
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 7, 2006
DocketED 85524
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 S.W.3d 34 (Nu-Art Series v. Creative Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nu-Art Series v. Creative Company, 188 S.W.3d 34, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 136 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Creative Company appeals a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis granting Nu-Art Series’ (“Nu-Art”) Petition for Specific Performance and ordering Creative Company to convey to Nu-Art by quitclaim deed Creative Company’s interest in property located at 1602-1608 Locust in the City of St. Louis. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Train v. BUSENBARRICH
188 S.W.3d 34 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 S.W.3d 34, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nu-art-series-v-creative-company-moctapp-2006.