NTN Bearing Corp. v. United States
This text of 2015 CIT 76 (NTN Bearing Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip. Op. 15- 76
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
and
JTEKT CORPORATION, et al.,
Plaintiff-Intervenors Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge v. Court No. 10-00286 UNITED STATES,
Defendant,
THE TIMKEN COMPANY,
Defendant-intervenor.
JUDGMENT
The court has reviewed the amended determination on remand (“Amended Remand
Redetermination”) issued by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Department”) in this litigation. Am. Results of Remand
Redetermination (May 7, 2015), ECF No. 101 (“Am. Remand Redetermination”).1 The court
concludes that the Amended Remand Redetermination complies with the court’s opinion and
1 Commerce filed the remand redetermination on May 4, 2015, Results of Remand Redetermination, ECF No. 98, and on the same day sought leave to file an amended remand redetermination noting that The Timken Company, defendant-intervenor in this action, had commented on the draft remand redetermination, Def.’s Consent Mot. for an Extension of Time, ECF No. 99. The court granted this request on May 5, 2015. Order, ECF No. 100. Court No. 10-00286 Page 2
order in NTN Corp. of America v. United States, 39 CIT __, 46 F. Supp. 3d 1375 (2015)
(“NTN”), to reconsider the final determination in Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France,
Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an
Order in Part, 75 Fed. Reg. 53,661 (Int’l Trade Admin. Sept. 1, 2010) (“Final Results”). In
NTN, the court granted defendant’s request for a voluntary remand to Commerce for correction
of certain errors in the credit expenses used in the calculation of constructed export price for
plaintiffs (collectively, “NTN”).2 NTN, 39 CIT at __, 46 F.Supp.3d at 1388-89. The court also
held unlawful the Department’s policy, rule, or practice of issuing liquidation instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection fifteen days after the date of publication of the final results of an
administrative review and stated the court’s intention of granting a declaratory judgment to this
effect when final judgment is entered in this case. Id. at __, 46 F.Supp.3d at 1388.
During the remand proceeding, Commerce revised its calculation of NTN’s U.S. credit
expenses to correct the errors and recalculated the weighted-average dumping margin for NTN.
Am. Remand Redetermination 1. The changes to the calculation, however, did not result in a
change in the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for NTN, which Commerce
continued to determine to be13.46%. Id. The Timken Company, defendant-intervenor in this
action, filed comments in support of the Amended Remand Redetermination. The Timken Co.’s
Comments on the U.S. Dep’t of Commerce’s May 7, 2015 Am. Results of Remand
Redetermination Pursuant to Ct. Remand (June 5, 2015), ECF No. 102. No other party to this
action filed comments on the Amended Remand Redetermination and no party disputes that the
2 The plaintiffs are NTN Bearing Corp. of Am., NTN Corp., NTN Bower Corp., Am. NTN Bearing Mfg. Corp., NTN–BCA Corp., and NTN Driveshaft, Inc. (collectively “NTN”). Pl.’s Am. Compl. 1 (Oct. 17, 2011), ECF No. 66. Court No. 10-00286 Page 3
redetermination complies with the court’s directive in NTN. Therefore, upon consideration of
the Amended Remand Redetermination, all comments thereon, and all other filings and
proceedings had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Department’s decision to apply the “zeroing” methodology in the Final Results, be, and hereby is, affirmed; it is further
ORDERED that the Amended Remand Redetermination be, and hereby is, affirmed; it is further
ORDERED that the Department’s policy, rule, or practice of issuing liquidation instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection fifteen (15) days after the date of publication of the final results of an administrative review be, and hereby is, declared to have been unlawful as applied to NTN in the implementation of the Final Results; and it is further
ORDERED that entries of merchandise that are affected by this litigation shall be liquidated in accordance with the final and conclusive court decision in this action.
/s/Timothy C. Stanceu Timothy C. Stanceu Judge Dated: July 14, 2015 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 CIT 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ntn-bearing-corp-v-united-states-cit-2015.