Ntavelis v. Seremetis

240 A.D.2d 643, 659 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6793

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rutledge J.), dated February 16, 1996, which, upon a jury verdict against her and in favor of the defendant, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

To the extent that portions of the plaintiffs hospital records were improperly admitted into evidence by the trial court, we find that any such error was harmless (cf., Borgo v Sontag, 98 AD2d 786; see also, Kutanovski v DeCicco, 152 AD2d 540; Russo v Osofsky, 112 AD2d 926). The plaintiffs remaining contention is lacking in merit (see, e.g., Capone v Gannon, 150 AD2d 749; Saleh v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 119 AD2d 652). O’Brien, J. P., Copertino, Thompson and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ntavelis v. Seremetis, 240 A.D.2d 643, 659 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 643 (Ntavelis v. Seremetis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Borgo v. Sontag
98 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Russo v. Osofsky
112 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Saleh v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
119 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Capone v. Gannon
150 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Kutanovski v. DeCicco
152 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)