N.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

N.S. v. State

838 So. 2d 1209, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2560, 2003 WL 728379

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 5, 2003

DocketNo. 2D01-5629

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 838 So. 2d 1209 (N.S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.S. v. State, 838 So. 2d 1209, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2560, 2003 WL 728379 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

We affirm N.S.’s convictions and sentences for burglary of a structure and petit theft; however, we remand for correction of the disposition order.

The State filed a petition for delinquency charging N.S. with burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. As part of a plea agreement with the State, N.S. pleaded no contest to reduced charges of burglary of a structure and petit theft. The trial court accepted N.S.’s plea to the reduced charges; however, the disposition order incorrectly states that N.S. pleaded no contest to the original charges. On remand, the trial court must enter a corrected disposition order that accurately reflects the crimes to which N.S. pleaded.

Affirmed but remanded for correction of the disposition order.

WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STRINGER, Judge.

We affirm N.S.’s convictions and sentences for burglary of a structure and petit theft; however, we remand for correction of the disposition order.

The State filed a petition for delinquency charging N.S. with burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. As part of a plea agreement with the State, N.S. pleaded no contest to reduced charges of burglary of a structure and petit theft. The trial court accepted N.S.’s plea to the reduced charges; however, the disposition order incorrectly states that N.S. pleaded no contest to the original charges. On remand, the trial court must enter a corrected disposition order that accurately reflects the crimes to which N.S. pleaded.

Affirmed but remanded for correction of the disposition order.

WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ„ Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

838 So. 2d 1209, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2560, 2003 WL 728379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ns-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack