N.S. v. State
506 So. 2d 1157, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1219, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12102
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in N.S. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1602 →
Opinion
Although reversal and remand would be required, as a matter of law, on authority of Smith v. State, 500 So.2d 125 (Fla.1986) and Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971), for failure of the trial court to grant a hearing where it was learned at trial that the State failed to comply with a demand for discovery, we also find merit in the appellant’s second argument that the evidence is legally insufficient to sustain the adjudication of delinquency.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to discharge the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
N.S. v. State, 506 So. 2d 1157, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1219, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12102 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
506 So. 2d 1157 (N.S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
500 So. 2d 125 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Richardson v. State
246 So. 2d 771 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)