NRC Environmental Services Inc. v. Barnards Holdings, Inc.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON NRC ENVIRONMENTAL No. 3:19-cv-01133-JR SERVICES, INC., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, v. BARNARDS HOLDINGS, INC., ORDER fka WATER TRUCK SERVICE, INC., an Oregon corporation, and BOB JONAS, an individual domiciled in Oregon, Defendants. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation (#29) on October 30, 2019, in which she recommends that this Court deny Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss portions of Defendants' third counterclaim. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna- 1 - ORDER Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings & Recommendation [29]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to dismiss portions of Defendants’ third counterclaim [22] is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED December 7, 2019
Lt anid — MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
NRC Environmental Services Inc. v. Barnards Holdings, Inc. (NRC Environmental Services Inc. v. Barnards Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.