NPS Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Underweiser & Underweiser
539 N.E.2d 100, 73 N.Y.2d 996, 541 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 492
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order modified, with costs to appellants, by denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of the late Justice Leonard H. Sandler at the Appellate Division (141 AD2d 412, 414-417). Certified question not answered as unnecessary.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
NPS Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Underweiser & Underweiser, 539 N.E.2d 100, 73 N.Y.2d 996, 541 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 492 (N.Y. 1989).
539 N.E.2d 100 (NPS Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Underweiser & Underweiser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Geltzer v. DuFour Pastry Kitchens, Inc.
34 A.D.3d 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)