NPS Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Underweiser & Underweiser
This text of 539 N.E.2d 100 (NPS Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Underweiser & Underweiser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order modified, with costs to appellants, by denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of the late Justice Leonard H. Sandler at the Appellate Division (141 AD2d 412, 414-417). Certified question not answered as unnecessary.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
539 N.E.2d 100, 73 N.Y.2d 996, 541 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nps-engineers-constructors-inc-v-underweiser-underweiser-ny-1989.