Noyes v. University Realty, Inc.
472 A.2d 808, 1 Conn. App. 453
Opinion
The appellant did not appear to argue this appeal on the date the case was assigned for hearing. Subsequently, a motion to reargue was denied by the court because we were not persuaded that the reasons given for the appellant’s absence warranted reargument.
Furthermore, a review of the record and briefs indicates that there was no error.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Noyes v. University Realty, Inc., 472 A.2d 808, 1 Conn. App. 453 (Colo. Ct. App. 1984).
472 A.2d 808 (Noyes v. University Realty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bancboston Mortgage Corporation v. Smith, No. Cv9-8131 (May 26, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 5156 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Noyes v. University Realty, Inc.
474 A.2d 1259 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1984)