Noyes v. Buskirk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Noyes v. Buskirk

979 So. 2d 296, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2689, 2008 WL 539337

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 29, 2008·No. Nos. 2D07-2323, 2D07-2806·Published

Opinion

ARTIGLIERE, RALPH, Associate Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s amended final summary judgment in all respects except for the allocation of attorney’s fees. During oral argument the parties agreed that the trial court’s allocation of attorney’s fees was in error and that the allocation should have been in accordance with section 64.081, Florida Statutes (2006).

Therefore we remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

STRINGER and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ARTIGLIERE, RALPH, Associate Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s amended final summary judgment in all respects except for the allocation of attorney’s fees. During oral argument the parties agreed that the trial court’s allocation of attorney’s fees was in error and that the allocation should have been in accordance with section 64.081, Florida Statutes (2006).

Therefore we remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

STRINGER and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Noyes v. Buskirk, 979 So. 2d 296, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2689, 2008 WL 539337 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

979 So. 2d 296 (Noyes v. Buskirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.