Noyce v. Jones

25 Neb. 643
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Neb. 643 (Noyce v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noyce v. Jones, 25 Neb. 643 (Neb. 1889).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

On the 8th day of September, 1885, in the district court of Douglas county, the defendant in error recovered judgment in an action of ejectment therein pending, and theretofore brought by him against the plaintiff in error for the recovery and possession of the east half of the north-west quarter of section twenty-one, township sixteen, range twelve east of the sixth principal meridian, in said ■county.

The defendant having moved for a new trial, on the ground that the judgment of the court was contrary to law, and not sustained by the evidence, and the motion being overruled, the cause was brought to this court to [644]*644abide the determination of the foregoing case of Joseph H. Gue against Henry O. Jones, involving the title of the defendant in error to the real estate in controversy in this case.

The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Neb. 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noyce-v-jones-neb-1889.