Noyack Med. Partners, LLC v. Osk IX, LLC

222 A.D.3d 562, 199 N.Y.S.3d 521, 2023 NY Slip Op 06598
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 21, 2023
DocketIndex No. 654665/21 Appeal No. 1283 Case No. 2022-05385
StatusPublished

This text of 222 A.D.3d 562 (Noyack Med. Partners, LLC v. Osk IX, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Noyack Med. Partners, LLC v. Osk IX, LLC, 222 A.D.3d 562, 199 N.Y.S.3d 521, 2023 NY Slip Op 06598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Noyack Med. Partners, LLC v Osk IX, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 06598)
Noyack Med. Partners, LLC v Osk IX, LLC
2023 NY Slip Op 06598
Decided on December 21, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: December 21, 2023
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., González, Scarpulla, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ.

Index No. 654665/21 Appeal No. 1283 Case No. 2022-05385

[*1]Noyack Medical Partners, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Osk IX, LLC, Defendant-Respondent. Suretec Insurance Company, Nonparty Respondent.


Cuddy & Feder LLP, White Plains (Brendan Goodhouse of counsel), for appellant.

Borg & Bryks LLP, New York (M. Alexander Bowie, II of counsel), for Osk IX, LLC, respondent.



Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jennifer Schecter, J.), entered November 28, 2022, which denied plaintiff's motion to reargue its motion to release or modify its undertaking, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

No appeal lies from the denial of the motion to reargue (see Phillips v Murtha, 215 AD3d 408, 408 [1st Dept 2023]). The order on appeal denied plaintiff's motion to reargue its prior motion to release or modify its undertaking. To the extent plaintiff argues it is appealing from the grant of defendant's motion to award attorneys' fees, the order appealed from, as it relates to defendant's motion, only augmented relief previously granted to the extent of calculating reasonable fees. Plaintiff's arguments were considered and rejected in the prior unappealed order deciding the motion to release or modify the undertaking.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: December 21, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 A.D.3d 562, 199 N.Y.S.3d 521, 2023 NY Slip Op 06598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/noyack-med-partners-llc-v-osk-ix-llc-nyappdiv-2023.