Nowling v. State
This text of 556 So. 2d 487 (Nowling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to burglary of a dwelling. As part of his sentence on this count, the trial court suspended his driver’s license for eight years. There is no indication that a motor vehicle was involved in the crime.
As the parties agree, this is not a case where the trial court is authorized to suspend a license or in which the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles must revoke the license upon receiving the record of the conviction. See Mandile v. State, 547 So.2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
Accordingly, we vacate that portion of the appellant’s sentence suspending his driver’s license. Otherwise, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 So. 2d 487, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 571, 1990 WL 7530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nowling-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.