Nowlin v. Wesson

93 Ala. 509
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

STONE, C. J.

— The testimony in this record is not positive, but it conduces to show that, when Mrs. Wesson executed the bill single sued on, the claim against her deceased husband was surrendered to her, and treated as no longer binding on his estate. If this be so, notwithstanding his estate may have been absolutely insolvent, it was, in contemplation of law, a valuable consideration, and will uphold the express promise made by the surviving widow. — Rutledge v. Townsend, 38 Ala. 706; Watson v. Reynolds, Ala. 191; Underwood v. Lovelace, 61 Ala. 155; Thornton v. Guice, 73 Ala. 321; Hixon v. Hetherington, 57 Ala. 165; Doss v. Peterson, 82 Ala. 253.

The Circuit Court erred in giving the charge shown in the record, to which exception was reserved.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nowlin v. Wesson, 93 Ala. 509 (Ala. 1890).

93 Ala. 509 (Nowlin v. Wesson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newman & Snell's State Bank v. Hunter
220 N.W. 665 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1928)
Galena National Bank v. Ripley
104 P. 807 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)