Nowell v. Royal Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Nowell v. Royal Cotton Mills

69 S.E. 129, 153 N.C. 322, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 76

DecidedOctober 26, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 69 S.E. 129 (Nowell v. Royal Cotton Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nowell v. Royal Cotton Mills, 69 S.E. 129, 153 N.C. 322, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 76 (N.C. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Peb Oubiam.

The Court is of opinion that the testimony of the plaintiff himself was amply sufficient to justify the court below in submitting the issue of negligence to the jury, notwithstanding the contradicting evidence of defendant, however strong, and therefore the motion to nonsuit was properly overruled.

We have examined the several exceptions to the evidence and charge of the court and are of opinion that no substantial error has been committed of sufficient importance to warrant us in ordering a new trial.

We therefore hold there is no reversible error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peb Oubiam.

The Court is of opinion that the testimony of the plaintiff himself was amply sufficient to justify the court below in submitting the issue of negligence to the jury, notwithstanding the contradicting evidence of defendant, however strong, and therefore the motion to nonsuit was properly overruled.

We have examined the several exceptions to the evidence and charge of the court and are of opinion that no substantial error has been committed of sufficient importance to warrant us in ordering a new trial.

We therefore hold there is no reversible error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 S.E. 129, 153 N.C. 322, 1910 N.C. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nowell-v-royal-cotton-mills-nc-1910.