Nowell v. Neal

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Nowell v. Neal

90 S.E.2d 247, 243 N.C. 175, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 549

DecidedNovember 23, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.E.2d 247 (Nowell v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nowell v. Neal, 90 S.E.2d 247, 243 N.C. 175, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 549 (N.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Cueiam.

After a protracted trial, involving the consideration of voluminous testimony, the jury resolved the controversial (first) issue in favor of defendant Neal. Careful consideration of plaintiff’s assignments of error, brought forward and argued in the brief filed in her behalf, discloses no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Cueiam.

After a protracted trial, involving the consideration of voluminous testimony, the jury resolved the controversial (first) issue in favor of defendant Neal. Careful consideration of plaintiff’s assignments of error, brought forward and argued in the brief filed in her behalf, discloses no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 S.E.2d 247, 243 N.C. 175, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nowell-v-neal-nc-1955.