NOWDEN v. State
297 S.W.3d 673, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1684, 2009 WL 4545097
Opinion
*674 ORDER
Movant, Dwan L. Nowden, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
NOWDEN v. State, 297 S.W.3d 673, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1684, 2009 WL 4545097 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
297 S.W.3d 673 (NOWDEN v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dickens v. State
297 S.W.3d 673 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)