Nowak v. YMCA South County

629 So. 2d 1083, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 56, 1994 WL 5227
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 12, 1994·No. No. 92-911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant, Andrzej Nowak, appeals from a workers’ compensation order dismissing his claim for an increase in benefits arising from concurrent employmént. In dismissing the claim, the judge of compensation claims ruled, as a matter of law, that concurrent employment may not be included as a permitted claim under the provisions of Section 440.02(24), Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), which purport to exclude earnings from concurrent employment from the definition of “wages.” We reverse, based upon this court’s recent decision in Vegas v. Globe Security, 627 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (en banc), stating that the 1990 amendment to section 440.02(24) has no impact on the calculation of average weekly wage under Section 440.14(l)(a), Florida Statutes.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.1

SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nowak v. YMCA South County, 629 So. 2d 1083, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 56, 1994 WL 5227 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

629 So. 2d 1083 (Nowak v. YMCA South County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fontainebleau Hilton v. Baldomino
630 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)