Nowacki v. United Services Automobile Ass'n Property & Casualty Insurance

186 A.D.2d 1038, 588 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11613
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 7, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 186 A.D.2d 1038 (Nowacki v. United Services Automobile Ass'n Property & Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nowacki v. United Services Automobile Ass'n Property & Casualty Insurance, 186 A.D.2d 1038, 588 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant insurer is entitled to summary judgment declaring that plaintiffs’ loss is excluded from coverage under the policy and that defendant thus has no obligation to indemnify plaintiffs for the damage to their property, the cost of repairing such damage, or the expense of safeguarding the property from further damage. Plaintiffs erroneously contend that the "collapse” of their stairs and patio and the separation of their foundation wall was caused by "hidden decay” and hence reimbursable under the policy, but there is no question that the damage was precipitated by conditions and occurrences specifically excluded from coverage. The record shows that, as a result of the abnormally high lake level and damaging wave action during the winter of 1989-1990, the base of the cliff upon which plaintiffs’ house is constructed eroded, causing the subsidence of the ground on the slope and the top of the embankment. That in turn directly caused the collapse of the stairs, the settling of the patio, and the weakening of the basement wall. Plaintiffs’ damage thus comes within several policy exclusions, the most encompassing of which deny coverage for "earth movement”, including "earth sinking” or "shifting”, and for "water damage”, including that from "surface water” and "waves”. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J. —Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Balio, Law-ton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilner v. Allstate Insurance
99 A.D.3d 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Labate v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
45 A.D.3d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Cali v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance
43 A.D.3d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Alamia v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
495 F. Supp. 2d 362 (S.D. New York, 2007)
Catucci v. Greenwich Insurance
37 A.D.3d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Sheehan v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
239 A.D.2d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Loretto-Utica Properties Corp. v. Douglas Co.
226 A.D.2d 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Kula v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
212 A.D.2d 16 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Weaver v. Hanover Insurance
206 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.D.2d 1038, 588 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nowacki-v-united-services-automobile-assn-property-casualty-insurance-nyappdiv-1992.