Novotny v. Yankton FPC, Warden

D. South Dakota

Novotny v. Yankton FPC, Warden

DecidedJuly 21, 2021

Docket4:21-cv-04074

StatusUnknown

This text of Novotny v. Yankton FPC, Warden (Novotny v. Yankton FPC, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Novotny v. Yankton FPC, Warden, (D.S.D. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

JASON FLOYD NOVOTNY, 4:21-CV-04074-RAL Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING vs. RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS YANKTON FPC, WARDEN, Respondent.

On April 22, 2021, Jason Floyd Novotny, an inmate at the Yankton Federal Prison Camp in Yankton, South Dakota, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Doc. 1. Respondent moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, for failure to state a claim, and for failure to exhaust. Doc. 8. Novotny opposes the motion and moves for the appointment of counsel and for a “joint cooperation/sharing agreement.” Docs. 12, 13, 15. Novotny seeks the immediate application of his earned time credits. Doc. 1 at 8. Under the First Step Act (FSA), time credits may be earned by eligible prisoners who successfully complete “evidence-based recidivism reduction programming” or “productive activities.” 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(A). The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has a phase-in period until January 15, 2022, to provide evidence-based recidivism programs and productive activities to all prisoners. Id. § 3621(h)(2) (emphasis added). In Holt v. Warden, this Court held that it cannot force the BOP to apply earned time credits toward prerelease custody before January 15, 2022. No. 20- 4064, 2021 WL 1925503, at *5-6 (D.S.D. May 13, 2021). Thus, an inmate that seeks to have the

Court compel the BOP to apply the credits before January 15, 2022, does not have standing and his/her petition must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See id. Here, Novotny seeks the immediate application of his earned time credits. See Doc. 1 at 8. In his opposition to Respondent’s motion, Novotny relies on the minority position, Goodman v. Ortiz, Civ. No. 20-7582, 2020 WL 5015613 (D.N.J. Aug. 25, 2020), to support his proposition that his earned time credits must be applied due to the FSA’s statutory language. Doc. 12 at 1. But this Court already considered Goodman and specifically sided with the majority position, declining to apply Goodman’s interpretation of the FSA. See Holt, 2020 WL 5015613 at *5. At this time, the Court cannot compel the BOP to apply earned time credits. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Doc. 8, is granted. It is finally ORDERED that Novotny’s pending motions, Docs. 13 and 15, are denied as moot. DATED July 21%, 2021 BY THE COURT:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

JASON FLOYD NOVOTNY, 4:21-CV-04074-RAL Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING vs. RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS YANKTON FPC, WARDEN, Respondent.

On April 22, 2021, Jason Floyd Novotny, an inmate at the Yankton Federal Prison Camp in Yankton, South Dakota, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Doc. 1. Respondent moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, for failure to state a claim, and for failure to exhaust. Doc. 8. Novotny opposes the motion and moves for the appointment of counsel and for a “joint cooperation/sharing agreement.” Docs. 12, 13, 15. Novotny seeks the immediate application of his earned time credits. Doc. 1 at 8. Under the First Step Act (FSA), time credits may be earned by eligible prisoners who successfully complete “evidence-based recidivism reduction programming” or “productive activities.” 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(A). The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has a phase-in period until January 15, 2022, to provide evidence-based recidivism programs and productive activities to all prisoners. Id. § 3621(h)(2) (emphasis added). In Holt v. Warden, this Court held that it cannot force the BOP to apply earned time credits toward prerelease custody before January 15, 2022. No. 20- 4064, 2021 WL 1925503, at *5-6 (D.S.D. May 13, 2021). Thus, an inmate that seeks to have the

Court compel the BOP to apply the credits before January 15, 2022, does not have standing and his/her petition must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See id. Here, Novotny seeks the immediate application of his earned time credits. See Doc. 1 at 8. In his opposition to Respondent’s motion, Novotny relies on the minority position, Goodman v. Ortiz, Civ. No. 20-7582, 2020 WL 5015613 (D.N.J. Aug. 25, 2020), to support his proposition that his earned time credits must be applied due to the FSA’s statutory language. Doc. 12 at 1. But this Court already considered Goodman and specifically sided with the majority position, declining to apply Goodman’s interpretation of the FSA. See Holt, 2020 WL 5015613 at *5. At this time, the Court cannot compel the BOP to apply earned time credits. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Doc. 8, is granted. It is finally ORDERED that Novotny’s pending motions, Docs. 13 and 15, are denied as moot. DATED July 21%, 2021 BY THE COURT:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Novotny v. Yankton FPC, Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/novotny-v-yankton-fpc-warden-sdd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack