Novodai Inc v. Pro-Cam Services LLC

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 23, 2013
Docket147667
StatusPublished

This text of Novodai Inc v. Pro-Cam Services LLC (Novodai Inc v. Pro-Cam Services LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Novodai Inc v. Pro-Cam Services LLC, (Mich. 2013).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 23, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

147667 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack NOVODAI, INC., David F. Viviano, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ Justices Appellant, v SC: 147667 COA: 310000 Ottawa CC: 11-002428-CK PRO-CAM SERVICES, L.L.C. and MOL BELTING SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/ Appellees.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 23, 2013 h1216 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Novodai Inc v. Pro-Cam Services LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/novodai-inc-v-pro-cam-services-llc-mich-2013.