Novo v. City of South Miami
519 So. 2d 746, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 481, 1988 WL 8413
Opinion
Affirmed. Compare Wong v. City of Miami, 237 So.2d 132 (Fla.1970), Alderman v. Lamar, 493 So.2d 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 503 So.2d 326 (Fla. 1987) and Eder v. Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 463 So.2d 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) with State, Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Kropff 491 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) and Weissberg v. City of Miami Beach, 383 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Novo v. City of South Miami, 519 So. 2d 746, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 481, 1988 WL 8413 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
519 So. 2d 746 (Novo v. City of South Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eder v. DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEH.
463 So. 2d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Weissberg v. City of Miami Beach
383 So. 2d 1158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Alderman v. Lámar
493 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
STATE, DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY v. Kropff
491 So. 2d 1252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Wong v. City of Miami
237 So. 2d 132 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)