Novo Point, LLC, Quantec, LLC, RPV, Ltd., and Jeffrey Baron v. Elissa Katz

Opinion

Order entered March 26, 2021

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00057-CV

NOVO POINT, LLC, QUANTEC, LLC, RPV, LTD., AND JEFFREY BARON, Appellants

V.

ELISSA KATZ, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01898-D

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellants’

request for a temporary injunction. On February 25, 2021, after being notified by

Dallas County Clerk John F. Warren that the clerk’s record had been prepared but

would not be filed because appellants had not paid the fee for the record, we

ordered appellants to file by March 8th written verification they had paid or made

arrangements to pay for the record. Appellants did not pay or make payment arrangements for the record.

Instead, appellant Jeffrey Baron filed a twenty-one volume sworn record, later

supplemented by an additional volume, that total over 9,000 pages. The filing

followed consultation with this Court’s clerk’s office and purported to be in

accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 28.1(e). That rule allows an

appellate court to dispense with the requirement of a formal clerk’s record in an

accelerated appeal and hear the appeal “on the original papers forwarded by the

trial court or on sworn and uncontroverted copies of those papers.” See TEX. R.

APP. P. 28.1(e).

Before the Court are (1) appellants Novo Point, LLC, Quantec, LLC, and

RPV, Ltd.’s (collectively, Novo Point) motion for clarification of our February

25th order in light of the sworn record filed by Baron and for permission to join in

the sworn record; (2) appellees’ objection to the sworn record; and, (3) Novo

Point’s response.

We note rule 28.1(e) is a discretionary rule and its purpose is to allow an

appellate court the opportunity to reach the merits of an accelerated appeal as soon

as possible by dispensing with the time required for the trial court clerk to prepare

the record. See In Re J.S., 136 S.W.3d 716, 717 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2004, order).

We also note that a party wishing to avail itself of rule 28.1(e) must file a motion

in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a) and demonstrate why proceeding under rule 28.1(e) would be proper. See id. Baron did not file a

motion, and the sworn record was filed almost a month after the deadline for the

formal clerk’s record as set out in rule of appellate procedure 35.1(b).

We decline to exercise our discretion to proceed without a formal record.

Accordingly, we DENY Novo Point’s motion to join in the sworn record and

STRIKE the sworn record and supplement. We again ORDER appellants to file

written verification of payment or payment arrangements for the clerk’s record.

We caution appellants that failure to file the requested verification by April 5,

2021 will result in the appeal being dismissed without further notice. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 37.3(b).

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Mr.

Warren and the parties.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE