Novikoff v. Polanskoy

26 A.D.2d 513, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4071

This text of 26 A.D.2d 513 (Novikoff v. Polanskoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Novikoff v. Polanskoy, 26 A.D.2d 513, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Motion for an order directing respondents to pay certain sums of money during the pendency of the appeal is in all respects denied. That branch of the motion seeking poor person relief is denied as unnecessary. By statute and court rule the appellant may appeal from a determination of the Family Court upon the original record and six typewritten copies of the brief and appendix with proof of service of one copy (Family Ct. Act, § 1016; CPLR 5526; Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department, part 1, rules V, VI). Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5526
New York CVP § 5526

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 A.D.2d 513, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/novikoff-v-polanskoy-nyappdiv-1966.